Announcement PDF ASX ANNOUNCEMENT RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 Exceptional Recoveries Further Improve to Over 90% Enhancing Near Term Heap Leach Cash Flow Opportunity for Van Uden Gold Project Highlights TG Metals Limited (TG Metals or the Company) (ASX:TG6) is pleased to provide an update on further results from column leach metallurgical testwork underway for the Van Uden Gold Project in Western Australia. Current Laterite Resource that could be initially utilized in the heap leach operation is 1.05 Mt @ 0.52 g/t Au for 17,700 ounces*. A further 1.85 Mt @ 1.05 g/t au for 62,400 ounces** in transition material may also be amenable to heap leach. Multiple laterite targets have been identified from soil sampling that has the potential to double the current laterite resource should planned drilling be effective in defining laterite gold mineralization. * See Table 1 ** See Table 2 ■ Column leach testwork on Laterite gold mineralisation increases recoveries to over 90% after a short 52 day leaching period ■ This is a further increase to the 88% recoveries achieved after a 35 day leaching period ■ Exceptional recovery trends demonstrate: o Excellent amenability and high gold recoveries through short term heap leach treatment o Likely positive grade reconciliation to ore treated ■ Current Laterite Resource that could be initially utilized in the heap leach operation is 1.05 Mt @ 0.52 g/t Au for 17,700 ounces* ■ The Company also expects a further 1.85 Mt @ 1.05 g/t au for 62,400 ounces** in transition material may also be amenable to heap leach ■ Multiple additional laterite mineralisation targets have been identified across the Companies extensive tenure which could add additional ore to the heap leach operation ■ Works underway to accelerate Project start up: o Lodgement of Mining Proposal expected to occur imminently o Mining contractor engagement has commenced for laterite mining and earthworks construction o Scoping Study outcomes to be announced released in Q2 2026 o Equipment sourcing has commenced ■ Final Investment Decision on track to be made in Q3 2026 ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ 2 TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au TG Metals CEO, Mr. David Selfe stated; “The heap leach testwork has continued to outperform expectations and reinforces our high level of confidence of favourable outcomes for a heap leaching operation on over one million tonnes of Laterite within the Van Uden gold deposit (see Table 1). Achieving high gold extractions comparable to or better than carbon in leach (CIL) Plants, reinforces the strategy of onsite gold processing for the laterite component of the Van Uden deposit. Processing onsite has the advantages, via heap leach, of no or transport costs, no grinding costs, no tailings dam costs. On the back of the results so far we have sourced potential used equipment to accelerate the startup of the heap leach project. We are also moving ahead with mine designs which take in the entire laterite resource. The Laterite is at surface, so requires no pre-stripping, minimal handling and a potential onsite facility means no transport costs. The focus is on delivering low mining costs, coupled with the low upfront capital and operating costs via a heap leach processing pathway.” Gold Heap Leach As stated in the initial gold heap leach results announcement 30 April 2026, the Laterite resources at Van Uden are well suited to onsite heap leaching due to their physical characteristics allowing excellent percolation and rapid leach kinetics. Being at surface and with no waste removal required for extraction, the Laterite presents a low cost mining opportunity. Onsite processing eliminates trucking costs and milling costs associated with toll milling and ore purchase to third party processing plants. Available Laterite in the current resource model is shown in Table 1 below. Table 1: Van Uden Laterite Resource (Subset of the Van Uden MRE – see Table 4) Material Indicated Inferred Total Tonnes Grade Gold (oz) Tonnes Grade Gold (oz) Tonnes Grade Gold (oz) (Au g/t) (Au g/t) (Au g/t) Laterite 886,000 0.56 15,900 167,000 0.33 1,800 1,053,000 0.52 17,700 In addition, there is a significant proportion of transition material which may be suitable for the application of heap leach technology. Table 2 below shows the currently defined Transition material within the Van Uden Resource. It is the Company’s intention to test the Transition material for heap leach amenability as soon as suitable sample can be obtained. Table 2: Van Uden Transition Resource (Subset of the Van Uden MRE – see Table 4) Material Grade Grade Grade (Au g/t) (Au g/t) (Au g/t) Transition 1,115,000 1.07 38,300 740,000 1.01 24,100 1,855,000 1.05 62,400 Gold (oz) Indicated Inferred Total Tonnes Gold (oz) Tonnes Gold (oz) Tonnes ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ 3 TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au The Company has held initial meetings with the DMPE (WA) to progress the pathway for Mining Proposal submission and has commenced engagement with suitable contractors for mining and earthworks activities. Equipment sourcing has also advanced with identification of used heap leach specific equipment as well as obtaining quotations for new equipment. A decision on equipment selection is expected in the coming weeks. Mining engineering studies are advancing ahead of final metallurgical parameters which will become available upon completion of the Column Leach testwork. A preliminary design, Figure 1, has been formed to guide location of the Heap Leach pads, ponds and associated infrastructure. If the used equipment available is secured, this design will be modified to suit. Figure 1 – Conceptual Heap Leach Design in 3D perspective view ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ 4 TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au Gold Leaching Testwork Update As detailed in ASX announcement 30 April 2026, TG Metals has engaged Independent Metallurgical Operations Pty Ltd (IMO) based in Western Australia, to conduct column leach metallurgical testwork on 3 composite lateritic samples recovered from previous mining stockpiles and historical surface excavations at the Company’s Van Uden Gold project. The testwork is ongoing at Metallurgy Pty Ltd, a commercial laboratory located in Perth, Western Australia. The results and testwork program were overseen by independent consult Michael Rodriguez. The initial reported testwork showed up to 88% recovery achieved after 35 days, the ongoing column leaching has now exceeded that recovery into the high 90s, showing 99.8% in the Tasman (Column Two) sample (Figure 3). This trend is showing an overcall to the assayed head grade which indicates that there is more gold in the samples used than indicated by the assaying. This was also seen in the bottle roll results also reported in ASX announcement 30 April 2026, where the calculated head grade exceeded the assayed head grade. The results so far are depicted in the charts in Figures 2 to 4. All columns remain under leach and will remain so until the extractions reach a plateau. This will ensure that all available gold is recovered and the apparent overcall to assay grade can be calculated. Figure 2 - Leaching Times for Column One Leach Tests ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ 5 TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au Figure 3 - Leaching Times for Column Two Leach Tests Figure 4 - Leaching Times for Column Three Leach Tests ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ 6 TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au Key findings so far are that only 3.05% slumping has occurred in Column One, slightly up from the 2.94% slumping observed previously, 14.7% in column two, marginally up from 13.9% observed previously and only 1.03% in Column Three, compared to 0.77% seen previously. The leach kinetics remain on an upward trend and rapid in the initial time phases, peaking at an indicated 99.8% recovery in column two after 52 days and 63.0% recovery in column one after 60 days and 50.4% recovery in column three after 25 days following carbon loading. All columns remain under leach and are showing continuing gold extractions. The intended full leach time was up to 90 days for each column, however this will be monitored for terminal leaching trends as they appear. The very high recoveries in Column Two, approaching an indicative 100% are attributed to an undercall in the assay grade Vs actual grade. This will be further resolved upon full leaching of the Column and calculating the actual head grade from the recovered gold and residue grades at the end of the test. Regardless, this is still showing high recoveries and indicates potential for upside in recovered gold Vs assayed gold. A total of three (3) composites were generated utilising samples taken from historical mine workings which have exposed Laterite. Figure 5 shows the location of the samples and Table 3 lists the location coordinates. Table 3 – Collar Locations of Metallurgical Samples Sample ID Type Easting Northing Tenement No. L01 Composite 749,968.22 6,439,909.94 M77/477 L02 Composite 750,264.15 6,439,464.67 M77/478 L03 Composite 749,503.00 6,440,375.34 M77/477 ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ 7 TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au Figure 5 – Location plan of the three Laterite samples and Laterite resource. ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ 8 TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au Next Steps • All three Columns under leach will progress and be monitored and recorded up to a full leach cycle. • Application for a Mining Proposal to encompass Laterite mining and heap leach pads and facilities has commenced. Final pad design parameters will be determined from the full column leach test results which will be available at the end of the full leach cycle. • The full metallurgical report will be made available to potential heap leach plant suppliers. Used Plant is also under consideration for early acquisition. • Further optimisation testwork is planned to test the Laterite for improvements in reagent use and operating cost reductions via research and development initiatives. • First stage grade control drilling of the Laterite will commence upon staged pit designs currently being finalised. • Column leach testwork on other mineralisation types at Van Uden to also commence. 9 ASX ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au About The Van Uden Resource The Van Uden gold MRE was updated earlier this month, increasing the Indicated category by more than 120%. This has allowed progression of mining and processing studies focused on utilising the Indicated resources in the near term. The surface Laterite is one component of this and the most immediate potential, however further Indicated resources deeper in the profile may also lend themselves to Heap Leach processing technology. The updated MRE below in Table 4 shows the current resource status: Table 4: MRE – Van Uden Gold Deposit NOTES: The Mineral Resources statement conforms to the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) 2012 Edition. All tonnages are dry metric tonnes. The laterite portion of the mineralisation has been reported at a cut-off grade of 0.10 g/t Au by area within a A$6,000/oz Au optimised pit shell. All other material types are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.30 g/t Au by area within a A$6,000/oz Au optimised pit shell based on mining parameters and operating costs typical for Australian open pit extraction deposits of a similar scale and geology. Minor discrepancies may occur due to rounding of appropriate significant figures. The resources comply with the Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction (RPEEE), a key principle in mineral resource reporting that requires the competent person to demonstrate that a mineral deposit has the potential to be economically extracted in the future. Material Grade Grade Grade (Au g/t) (Au g/t) (Au g/t) Laterite 886,000 0.56 15,900 167,000 0.33 1,800 1,053,000 0.52 17,700 Oxide 1,976,000 1.15 73,300 414,000 0.91 12,100 2,390,000 1.11 85,400 Transition 1,115,000 1.07 38,300 740,000 1.01 24,100 1,855,000 1.05 62,400 Fresh 580,000 1.35 25,100 2,057,000 1.21 80,200 2,637,000 1.24 105,300 Total 4,557,000 1.04 152,600 3,378,000 1.09 118,200 7,935,000 1.06 270,800 Gold (oz) Indicated Inferred Total Mineral Resource Estimate Van Uden Gold Deposit - April 2026 Tonnes Gold (oz) Tonnes Gold (oz) Tonnes 10 ASX ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au About TG Metals TG Metals is an ASX listed company focused on exploring and developing gold and lithium assets at its wholly owned Lake Johnston Project and 80% owned Van Uden Gold Project in the stable jurisdiction of Western Australia. The Lake Johnston Project hosts the Burmeister high grade lithium deposit, Jaegermeister lithium pegmatites and several surrounding lithium prospects. Burmeister is in proximity to four lithium processing plants and undeveloped deposits. The Van Uden Gold Project contains past producing gold mines and is in proximity to operating gold processing Plants (Figure 6). Authorised for release by TG Metals Board of Directors. Contact Investor Relations Mr David Selfe Evy Litopoulous Chief Executive Officer ResolveIR Email: info@tgmetals.com.au Email: evy@resolveir.com Figure 6 – Location Map showing TG Metals’ Van Uden Gold Project 11 ASX ASX ANNOUNCEMENT I RELEASED 14 MAY 2026 ________________________________________________________________ TG METALS LTD ASX TG6 ABN 40 644 621 830 Level 2, Suite 3 28 Ord Street West Perth WA 6005 T: +61 8 6211 5099 W: www.tgmetals.com.au Competent Person Statement Information in this announcement that relates to exploration results, exploration strategy, exploration targets, geology, drilling and mineralisation is based on information compiled by Mr David Selfe who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Selfe has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activities that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Selfe has consented to the inclusion in this report of matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears. Information in this announcement that relates to metallurgical results, is based on information compiled by Mr David Selfe and has been reviewed by Mr Michael Rodriguez who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Rodriguez has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activities that he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Metallurgical Results. Mr Rodriguez has consented to the inclusion in this report of matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears. Forward Looking Statements This announcement may contain certain statements that may constitute “forward looking statements”. Such statements are only predictions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual values, results, performance achievements to differ materially from those expressed, implied or projected in any forward looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. Words such as “expect(s)”, “feel(s)”, “believe(s)”, “will”, “may”, “anticipate(s)” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward- looking statements. These statements include, but are not limited to statements regarding future production, resources or reserves and exploration results. All such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of the Company, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: (i) those relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits and conclusions of economic evaluations, (ii) risks relating to possible variations in reserves, grade, planned mining dilution and ore loss, or recovery rates and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, (iii) the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of feasibility studies, (iv) risks related to commodity price and foreign exchange rate fluctuations, (v) risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms or delays in obtaining governmental approvals or in the completion of development or construction activities, and (vi) other risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s prospects, properties and business strategy. Our audience is cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date hereof, and we do not undertake any obligation to revise and disseminate forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of or non-occurrence of any events. The Company believes that it has a reasonable basis for making the forward-looking Statements in the presentation based on the information contained in this and previous ASX announcements. The Company is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in this ASX release, and the Company confirms that, to the best of its knowledge, all material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the exploration results in this release continue to apply and have not materially changed. 1 JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data (Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Sampling techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. • Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. • Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. • In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. • Bulk samples were collected from laterite material exposed in historical workings and stockpiles within the Van Uden Project. Sampling comprised multiple grab samples collected across exposed pisolitic laterite zones. These were composited to generate bulk samples of sufficient mass for metallurgical testwork. In selected areas, sampling was undertaken proximal to known mineralisation to ensure adequate gold tenor for metallurgical assessment. Drilling techniques • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). • No drilling was undertaken for this metallurgical testwork. Bulk samples were obtained from surface exposures and historical workings. Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. • Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. • Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. • Not applicable. Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical • Not applicable. 2 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary studies. • Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. • The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. • If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. • For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. • Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. • Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. • Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. • Bulk samples recovered from 3 stockpiled mineralised ore were received, and homogenised. Each composite sample was staged crushed to 100% passing 25mm. Homogenised sub-samples were split out to produce 10kg, 20kg and 220kg charges. • The 20kg and 10kg homogenised composite sub-samples were crushed to 12.5mm and 8mm respectively in preparation for downstream testwork including intermittent bottle roll and column leach testwork. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. • Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. • Metallurgical testwork including intermittent bottle roll (IBR) and column leach tests was managed by Independent Metallurgical Operations Pty Ltd (IMO) staff, at Metallurgy Pty Ltd a commercial laboratory located in Western Australia. • A sizing analysis was completed on composite sub-samples. • All composite samples prepared for downstream testwork had ICP OES analysis for 42 elements completed and gold assays were determined using standard fire assay methods. • Raw water was recovered from the mine stie, assayed and used for all subsequent testwork. • Samples were recovered from the IBR tests and columns to obtain kinetic time vs extraction curves. IBR and column testwork was completed in parallel to obtain “read across” information. • Kappes drawdown tests were applied to establish optimum agglomeration operating conditions. • 4m columns were predominantly used to reflect the forecast heap leach bench heights. A “clear” 2m column was used to observe the flow characteristics and for comparison in the leach cycle between a 4m column and a 2m column. 3 Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary • Metallurgical recoveries were calculated from solution assays and carbon loading estimates. Final recoveries will be reconciled with residues from the testwork. Verification of sampling and assaying • The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. • The use of twinned holes. • Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. • Discuss any adjustment to assay data. • Testwork procedures and results have been reviewed by an independent metallurgical consultant. The methods applied are considered appropriate for early-stage metallurgical assessment. Location of data points • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. • Specification of the grid system used. • Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • Coordinate system: MGA2020 Zone 50 for sample locations using GPS(+/- 3m accuracy). • Topography: LiDAR surface model. Data spacing and distribution • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • Whether sample compositing has been applied. • Sampling was selective and not conducted on a systematic grid. The sampling approach is not intended to represent spatial continuity, but rather to provide indicative metallurgical characteristics of laterite material types. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. • Sampling was undertaken from surface exposures and is not considered to be biased by structural orientation. Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • Samples were sealed in 44 gallon drums or 20L sealed buckets and labelled at site. • Chain of custody; Samples were taken to Welshpool by TG Metals Limited personnel. Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • The metallurgical program and results have been reviewed by an independent metallurgical consultant.. 4 Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary Mineral tenement and land tenure status • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. • The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. • All sampling is within in Mining Leases M77/477 and M77/478. The tenements are currently held by TG Gold Pty Ltd (80%) and Barto Gold Mining Pty Ltd (20%). Ownership: TG Metals Limited is the operator of the tenements via its 100% ownership of TG Gold Pty Ltd. • The tenements are in good standing and unaffected by heritage or environmental encumbrances. Exploration done by other parties • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. • Dieman, Laterite and Tasman Pits were previously mined and drilled by earlier operators as part of historic gold extraction. • Historic data have been reviewed where available. Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. • Orogenic, shear- and vein-hosted gold mineralisation occurs within the Forrestania greenstone belt along the sediment–mafic contact, which is mapped as the Van Uden Shear. Host rocks are amphibolite-facies metasediments and mafic volcanic units showing local quartz veining and minor schistose alteration. Gold mineralisation is structurally controlled and consistent with regional orogenic systems of the Western Australian Yilgarn Craton. • Most gold mineralisation is formed withing the sediments, however where the mafic/sediment contact undulates, the gold mineralisation is known to occur within the mafic rocks. • The laterite mineralisation comprises pisolitic and ferruginous material developed over primary gold mineralisation within the Van Uden Project area. Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of t